Translation into English is a benchmark of success in recent decades. Reaching the English reader maybe the bridge to reach the world. However, English readers are said to prefer fluent readings. In the modern capitalist world, is this preference granted? This study aimed at investigating the presence of a preference of fluency in the reviews of Davies’ translation of Al-Shidyāq’s Leg over Leg. The focus of this research is Arabic translated literature. Such a study is essential in revealing the extent to which the reviews of Arabic translated works go in line what scholars found in the reviews of non-Arabic translated ones into English. It is also fundamental in evaluating the fluency of Arabic translated works and comparing such an evaluation with that mentioned in previous studies. The approach adopted in this thesis included analysis of Leg over Leg’s translation, translation’s reviews and translator’s notes. Berman Analysis of translation was the tool to treat the first chapter of Leg over Leg. The reviews and notes were evaluated; the data obtained from the analysis were compared for parallelism. The findings of this research provided evidence that the reviews of translated Arabic works may deviate from what scholars confirmed about a presence of a preference of fluent translations. The main conclusions drawn from this study: there was no clear preference of fluency in the reviews of Davies’s translation of Leg over Leg; they were professionally deep and reliable; and Davies’s translation was transparent and showed its Arabic original. These findings matched what Davies stated in his notes. The researcher recommends conducting further studies to have a comprehensive understanding of the treatment and reception of Arabic translated works.
| Published in | International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation (Volume 8, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13 |
| Page(s) | 96-111 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Transparency, Fluency, Berman’s Analysis of Translation, Humphrey Davies’ Translation, Al-Shidyāq, Leg over Leg, Reviews of Translated Works, Translator’ Notes
| [1] | Al-Rawi, A. (2009). The Arabic ghoul and its Western transformation. Folklore, 120 (3), 291-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00155870903219730 |
| [2] | Alshayea, L. (2014). The translator’s in/visibility in Arabic-English translations of Islamic self-improvement books: A case study of the book “Enjoy Your Life” (Master thesis). The Saudi Arabian Cultural Bureau in London. (SDL Saudi Digital Library). |
| [3] | Al-Shidyāq, F. (2013). Leg over leg. (H. Davies, Ed.). New York, NY: New York University Press. (Original work published 1855). |
| [4] | Al-Shidyāq, F. (2013-2015). Leg over leg. (Vols. 1: 4). (H. Davies, Trans.). New York, NY: New York University Press. (Original work published 1855). |
| [5] | Anderman, G., & Rogers, M. (Eds.). (2005). In and out of English: For better, for worse? (Vol. 1). Multilingual Matters. |
| [6] | Asimakoulas, D. (2009). Rewriting. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. (pp. 241-245). London: Routledge. |
| [7] | Baker, M. (2009). Norms. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. (pp. 189-193). London: Routledge. |
| [8] | Bassnett, S. (2013). Translation studies. London: Routledge. |
| [9] | Beard, M., Ghazoul, F. & Shoukri, D. (2015). Reflections on modern literatures of the Middle East. Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics, (35), 241-262. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24772819 |
| [10] | Benjamin, W. (1968). The task of the translator. (H. Zohn. Trans.) In Venuti, L. (Ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 15-25). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1923). |
| [11] | Berman, A. (1985). Translation and the trials of the foreign. In Venuti, L. (Trans.& ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 284-97). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1985). |
| [12] | Blond, H. (1984). A comparative study of aspects of information structure in the Arabic and English expository paragraph (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Concordia University, Canada. |
| [13] | Booth, M. (2003). On translation and madness. Translation Review, 65 (1), 47-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07374836.2003.10523836 |
| [14] | Booth, M. (2008). Translator vs. author (2007): Girls of Riyadh go to New York. Translation Studies, 1 (2), 197-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14781700802113523 |
| [15] | Boullata, I. (2003) The Case for resistant translation from Arabic to English, Translation Review, 65: 1, 29-33. DOI: 10.1080/07374836.2003.10523834. |
| [16] | Carruthers, E. (2014). Linguistic exuberance and literary inventiveness [Review of the book Leg over Leg, by A. F. Al-Shidyāq]. Banipal, 49. http://www.banipal.co.uk/book_reviews/106/leg-over-leg/ |
| [17] | Carter, m. (2014, March 21). Why this book should win: Leg over leg Vol. 1, Ahmad Faris al-Shidyaq, translated by Humphrey Davies. Three Percent. http://www.rochester.edu/College/translation/threepercent/2014/03/21/why-this-book-should-win-leg-over-leg-vol-1-ahmad-faris-al-shidyaq-translated-by-humphrey-davies/ |
| [18] | Čerče, D. (2016). Between translation and transformation: recreating Steinbeck’s language in Of mice and men. The Translator, 23 (1), 67-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2016.1183092 |
| [19] | Cortés, O. (1998). Orientalism in translation: Familiarizing and defamiliarizing strategies. In Beylard-Ozeroff, A., Králová, J., & Moser-Mercer, B. (Eds.). Translators' Strategies and Creativity: selected papers from the 9th international conference on translation and interpreting, Prague, September 1995. In honor of Jiří Levý and Anton Popovič Translators’ Strategies and Creativity. (pp., 63-70). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/imamuebooks/reader.action?docID=784245&ppg= 77 |
| [20] | Creswell, R. (2015, October 8). The first great Arabic novel [Review of the book Leg over leg, by A. F. Al-Shidyāq]. The New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2015/10/08/first-great-arabic-novel/ |
| [21] | Davies, H. (2014, January). Leg over leg [Review of the book Leg over leg, by A. F. AlShidyāq]. The White Review. http://www.thewhitereview.org/fiction/legover-leg/ |
| [22] | Drugan, J. (2017). Ethics and social responsibility in practice: interpreters and translators engaging with and beyond the professions. The Translator, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2017.1281204 |
| [23] | Dukate, A. (2007). Manipulation as a specific phenomenon in translation and interpreting. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Riga: University of Latvia, Latvia. |
| [24] | El-Chidiac. F. (1855). La vie et les aventures de Fariac relation de ses voyages avec ses observations critiques sur les Arabes et sur autres peuples. Paris: Benjamin Duprat Librairie de L’institut. |
| [25] | Encyclopædia Britannica. (n.d.). Maqāmah. In Encyclopædia Britannica online. Retrieved May 7, 2017, from https://www.britannica.com/art/maqamah |
| [26] | Even-Zohar, I. (1978). The position of translated literature within the literary polysystems. In Venuti, L. (Ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 192-197). London: Routledge. |
| [27] | Fawcett, P. (2000). Translation in the broadsheets. The Translator, 6 (2): 295-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2000.10799070 |
| [28] | Hermans, T. (1996). The translator's voice in translated narrative. Target, 8: 1, 23-47. |
| [29] | House, J. (1997). Translation quality assessment: A model revisited (Vol. 410). Gunter Narr Verlag. |
| [30] | Interpretation of the meaning of the Noble Qur’an in the English language. (1996). (15th Ed.). (M. T. Al-Hilali, & M. M. Khan, Trans.). Riyadh: Darussalam. |
| [31] | Johnson-Davies, D., & Ghazoul, F. (1983). On translating Arabic literature: An interview with Denys Johnson-Davies. Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics, (3), 80-93. doi: 10.2307/521657. |
| [32] | Jones, F. (2009). Literary translation. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. (pp. 152-157). London: Routledge. |
| [33] | Kruger, H., & Rooy, B. (2012). Register and the features of translated language. Across Languages and Cultures, 13 (1), 33-65. https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.13.2012.1.3 |
| [34] | Laviosa, S. (2009). Universals. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. (pp. 306-310). London: Routledge. |
| [35] | Lefevere, A. (1983). Mother courage’s cucumber: Text, system and refraction in a theory of literature. In Venuti, L. (Ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 233-249). London: Routledge. |
| [36] | Levine, S. (1991). Manuel among the stars (Exit Laughing). World Literature Today, 65 (4), 587-594. doi: 10.2307/40147598. |
| [37] | Library of Arabic Literature. (n.d.). About. Retrieved May 11, 2017, from http://www.libraryofarabicliterature.org/about-the-series/ |
| [38] | Lv, L., & Ning, P. (2013). EST translation guided by reception theory. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3 (02), 114.-118. doi: 10.4236/ojml.2013.32015. |
| [39] | Maier, C. (1990). Reviewing Latin American literature in translation: Time to ‘proceed to the larger question’. Translation Review, 34 (1), 18-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07374836.1991.10523502 |
| [40] | Maier, C. (2009). Reviewing and criticism. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. (pp. 236-241). London: Routledge. |
| [41] | Merriam-Webster. (n.d). Barbarian. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved July 7, 2017, from https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/barbarian |
| [42] | Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Barbarism. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved July 7, 2017, from https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/barbarism |
| [43] | Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Barbarous. In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved July 7, 2017, from https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/barbarous |
| [44] | Munday, J. (2001). Introducing translation studies: Theories and application (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. |
| [45] | Naffis-Sahley, A. (2011, July 13). Humphrey Davies in conversation with André Naffis-Sahely [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYBFUOAD8ms |
| [46] | Nanquette, L. (2017). Translations of modern Persian literature in the United States: 1979–2011. The Translator, 23 (1), 49-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2016.1227530 |
| [47] | Orthofer, M. (2013, November 7). The complete review's review [Review of the book Leg over leg, by A. F. Al-Shidyāq]. The Complete Review. Retrieved from http://www.completereview.com/reviews/LoALNYU/legoverleg1.htm |
| [48] | Osers, E. (1998). Translation norms: Do they really exist? Benjamins Translation Library, 27, 53-62. DOI: 10.1075/btl.27.09ose. |
| [49] | Qualey, M. (2013, November 12). A mapping expedition across a very wide continent: An interview with Humphrey Davies on Leg over leg by Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq. https://www.libraryofarabicliterature.org/2013/a-mapping-expedition-across-a-very-wide-continent-an-interview-with-humphrey-davies-on-leg-over-leg-by-a%E1%B8%A5mad-faris-al-shidyaq/ |
| [50] | Salama-Carr, M. (2005). Transparency in translating from Arabic. Intercultural Communication Studies, 14 (4): 103-114. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=SalamaCarr%2C+M.+%282005%29.+Transparency+in+translating+from+Arabic.+Intercultural+Communication+Studies%2C+14+%284%29%3A+103-114.&btnG=&hl=ar&as_sdt=0%2C5 |
| [51] | Smith (2104, June 17). Aḥmad Fāris Al-Shidyāq’s Leg over leg [Review of the book Leg over leg, by A. F. Al-Shidyāq]. Music and Literature. http://www.musicandliterature.org/reviews/2014/6/16/ahmad-faris-Al-Shidyāqs-leg-overleg |
| [52] | Storace, P. (2015, November 18). After Rabelais [Review of the book Leg over leg, by A. F. Al-Shidyāq]. The Times Literary Supplement. 28-29. http://www.thetls.co.uk/articles/private/after-rabelais/ |
| [53] | Toury, G. (1978). The nature and role of norms in translation. In Venuti, L. (Ed.), The Translation Studies Reader (pp. 198-211). London: Routledge. |
| [54] | UNESCO. (n.d.), Statistics: TOP 10 Authors Translated for a Given Original Language: Index Translationum English. Retrieved May 4, 2017, from https://www.unesco.org/xtrans/bsstatexp.aspx |
| [55] | Venuti, L. (1995). The translator’s invisibility: A history of translation (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. |
| [56] | Venuti, L. (1998). The scandals of translation: Towards an ethics of difference. London: Routledge. |
| [57] | Vinay, J.-P. & Darbelnet, J. (1995). A comparative study of French and English: A methodology for translation. Juan C. Sager & M.-J. Hamel (Trans. & Eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. (Original work published 1954). |
| [58] | Williams, J., & Chesterman, A. (2014). The map: A beginner's guide to doing research in translation studies. Routledge. |
| [59] | Yargo, J. (2014, May 10). More steps than the stairway of a minaret inventiveness [Review of the book Leg over leg, by A. F. Al-Shidyāq]. Los Angeles Review of Books. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/steps-stairway-minaret-humphrey-davies-translation-faris-al-shidyaqs-leg-leg/ |
| [60] | أحمد جلايلي(2004). تحقيق المخطوطات: المفهوم والمنهج [Manuscript editing: Concept and methodology]. مجلة البحوث والدراسات [Journal of research and Study], 1 (1): 155-178 https://www.asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/ |
| [61] | أحمد فارس الشدياق (1855). الساق على الساق فيما هو الفارياق [Leg over leg]. Lebanon: Dar Anamudhajiah for Printing and Publishing. |
| [62] | أسماء بوبكري(2015). علامات الترقيم في بناء المشهد السردي: ذاكرة الجسد لأحلام مستغانمي نموذجا [Punctuation marks in the construction of the narrative scene: The body memory of Ahlam Mosteghanemi as a model]. الممارسات اللغوية [Lingual Practices]. 33: 144-166. from http://revue.ummto.dz/index.php/pla/article/view/1321 |
| [63] | أشرف الخريبي(June 6, 2012). اللغة العربية بين الدرس اللغوي والنقد الأدبي [Arabic literature between lingual study and literary critique] [Web log article] الألوكة http://www.alukah.net/publications_competitions/0/41695/ |
| [64] | الباحث العربي [The Arab Researcher]. (n.d.) الرقية[ruqyah. prayer] الباحث العربي [The Arab Researcher]. Retrieved in 2017, July 7 from http://www.baheth.info/ |
| [65] | رضوى عاشور (2009). الحداثة الممكنة: الشدياق والساق على الساق: الرواية الأولى في الأدب العربي الحديث [Possible modernity: Alshidyaq and leg over leg: The first novel in modern Arabic literature]. (2nd ed.). Cairo: Dar El-Shorouk. |
| [66] | عبد الفتاح كيليطو (1982). الأدب والغرابة: دراسة بنيوية في الأدب العربي [Literature and Strangeness: A structural study in Arabic literature]. Casablanca: Toubkal for Publishing. |
| [67] | محمد بن أبي بكر بن عبد القادرالرازي (1989). مختار الصحاح [Mukhtar Alsihah]. Beirut: Library of Lebanon. |
APA Style
Habiba Saud Alarifi. (2022). The Transparency of Humphrey Davies’ Translation of Ahmad Fāris Al-Shidyāq’s Leg over Leg. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation, 8(3), 96-111. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13
ACS Style
Habiba Saud Alarifi. The Transparency of Humphrey Davies’ Translation of Ahmad Fāris Al-Shidyāq’s Leg over Leg. Int. J. Appl. Linguist. Transl. 2022, 8(3), 96-111. doi: 10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13,
author = {Habiba Saud Alarifi},
title = {The Transparency of Humphrey Davies’ Translation of Ahmad Fāris Al-Shidyāq’s Leg over Leg},
journal = {International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation},
volume = {8},
number = {3},
pages = {96-111},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijalt.20220803.13},
abstract = {Translation into English is a benchmark of success in recent decades. Reaching the English reader maybe the bridge to reach the world. However, English readers are said to prefer fluent readings. In the modern capitalist world, is this preference granted? This study aimed at investigating the presence of a preference of fluency in the reviews of Davies’ translation of Al-Shidyāq’s Leg over Leg. The focus of this research is Arabic translated literature. Such a study is essential in revealing the extent to which the reviews of Arabic translated works go in line what scholars found in the reviews of non-Arabic translated ones into English. It is also fundamental in evaluating the fluency of Arabic translated works and comparing such an evaluation with that mentioned in previous studies. The approach adopted in this thesis included analysis of Leg over Leg’s translation, translation’s reviews and translator’s notes. Berman Analysis of translation was the tool to treat the first chapter of Leg over Leg. The reviews and notes were evaluated; the data obtained from the analysis were compared for parallelism. The findings of this research provided evidence that the reviews of translated Arabic works may deviate from what scholars confirmed about a presence of a preference of fluent translations. The main conclusions drawn from this study: there was no clear preference of fluency in the reviews of Davies’s translation of Leg over Leg; they were professionally deep and reliable; and Davies’s translation was transparent and showed its Arabic original. These findings matched what Davies stated in his notes. The researcher recommends conducting further studies to have a comprehensive understanding of the treatment and reception of Arabic translated works.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Transparency of Humphrey Davies’ Translation of Ahmad Fāris Al-Shidyāq’s Leg over Leg AU - Habiba Saud Alarifi Y1 - 2022/08/17 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13 T2 - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation JF - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation JO - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation SP - 96 EP - 111 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-1271 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20220803.13 AB - Translation into English is a benchmark of success in recent decades. Reaching the English reader maybe the bridge to reach the world. However, English readers are said to prefer fluent readings. In the modern capitalist world, is this preference granted? This study aimed at investigating the presence of a preference of fluency in the reviews of Davies’ translation of Al-Shidyāq’s Leg over Leg. The focus of this research is Arabic translated literature. Such a study is essential in revealing the extent to which the reviews of Arabic translated works go in line what scholars found in the reviews of non-Arabic translated ones into English. It is also fundamental in evaluating the fluency of Arabic translated works and comparing such an evaluation with that mentioned in previous studies. The approach adopted in this thesis included analysis of Leg over Leg’s translation, translation’s reviews and translator’s notes. Berman Analysis of translation was the tool to treat the first chapter of Leg over Leg. The reviews and notes were evaluated; the data obtained from the analysis were compared for parallelism. The findings of this research provided evidence that the reviews of translated Arabic works may deviate from what scholars confirmed about a presence of a preference of fluent translations. The main conclusions drawn from this study: there was no clear preference of fluency in the reviews of Davies’s translation of Leg over Leg; they were professionally deep and reliable; and Davies’s translation was transparent and showed its Arabic original. These findings matched what Davies stated in his notes. The researcher recommends conducting further studies to have a comprehensive understanding of the treatment and reception of Arabic translated works. VL - 8 IS - 3 ER -
Email: